Zuckerberg Pulls Support From Pro-Immigration Group He Previously Backed Debate Amid

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has withdrawn financial and public support from a pro-immigration advocacy group he once backed, a move that has reignited debate around corporate influence, political alignment, and Silicon Valley’s evolving stance on immigration policy.

According to people familiar with the decision, the withdrawal marks a clear shift from Zuckerberg’s earlier position, when he openly supported immigration reform efforts aimed at expanding skilled worker visas and protecting undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children. At the time, Zuckerberg argued that immigration was essential for innovation, economic growth, and America’s global competitiveness.

The pro-immigration group, which benefited from funding and visibility linked to Zuckerberg and Meta leadership, confirmed that support has ended but declined to speculate on the reasons behind the change. The organization stated it remains committed to its mission and will continue advocacy efforts through alternative funding sources.

Zuckerberg has not publicly commented in detail on the decision, though Meta representatives emphasized that the company does not directly control or dictate the personal political contributions of its executives. Still, the move has drawn attention due to Zuckerberg’s longstanding reputation as a vocal supporter of immigration-friendly policies.

Political analysts suggest the decision may reflect a broader recalibration by tech leaders as immigration debates become increasingly polarized. With tech companies facing regulatory scrutiny on privacy, artificial intelligence, and competition, some executives appear more cautious about aligning with politically sensitive causes.

Immigration advocates expressed disappointment, noting that support from high-profile tech figures has historically helped elevate the issue at the national level. They argue that the tech industry continues to rely heavily on immigrant talent and should remain engaged in policy discussions shaping workforce mobility.

Critics, however, say the move underscores concerns about corporate activism shifting with political and economic pressures. Some lawmakers argue that tech leaders selectively support causes when convenient, retreating when public opinion or regulatory risk changes.

The development also comes as Meta navigates its own challenges, including antitrust scrutiny, content moderation debates, and global expansion concerns. Observers note that distancing from controversial political causes may be part of a broader strategy to reduce political exposure.

Despite the withdrawal, Zuckerberg’s past statements supporting immigration reform remain on record, and it is unclear whether this move signals a permanent shift or a temporary pause. Experts caution against reading the decision as a wholesale reversal of beliefs, suggesting it may instead reflect changing priorities amid a complex political environment.

As immigration remains a central issue in U.S. policy debates, the role of corporate leaders—and the consequences of their support or silence—continues to attract close public attention.